For Immediate Release
12月 10, 2025
Media Contacts:
Trevor Fitzgibbon, 704-775-0487, [email protected]

Farm Action issued the following response to an announcement from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) on a $700M investment into regenerative agriculture.

This statement can be attributed to Angela Huffman, Farm Action’s president and co-founder: 

“Farm Action welcomes today’s announcement that the administration will direct hundreds of millions of dollars toward regenerative agriculture. Regenerative agriculture is not only better for the land and public health, but it also creates a path to rebuilding farmer profitability and reducing dependency on costly chemicals and other inputs controlled by a few giant companies.

Done right, this investment will help farmers lower their input costs, break free from the export-driven commodity overproduction treadmill, and move toward healthier, more resilient, and more profitable farming systems. This initiative reflects the priorities Farm Action has long championed and repeatedly urged the government to adopt.

If the Trump administration wants this initiative to succeed, USDA must make sure the Natural Resources Conservation Service—after significant funding cuts—has enough staff to get these dollars out quickly and fairly, reaching farmers across America, not just the largest operations by default. 

We cannot allow a repeat of the Climate-Smart Commodities program, where projects involving multinational corporations like JBS and Tyson Foods received the lion’s share of program dollars, fueling further consolidation.” 

This announcement from USDA and HHS mirrors calls Farm Action made in both its policy recommendations for the Make America Healthy Again Commission and, more recently, a letter it co-led to USDA signed by a coalition of 120 farmers and MAHA leaders calling for investment in regenerative agriculture. 

- Angela Huffman, Farm Action’s president and co-founder

While we are thrilled that the Trump administration is investing in supporting farmers to transition to regenerative agriculture, it is imperative for successful implementation that the farmers have training, meaning an investment in staffing at the Natural Resources Conservation Service.

It is also crucial to Make America Healthy Again that farming practices shift to non-toxic inputs. Reducing our exposure to toxic chemicals is how we achieve MAHA, and how Trump leaves a legacy of healthier children and grandchildren.

• Zen Honeycutt, Founding Executive Director,アメリカ中のママ and the Moms Across America Movement

Today’s announcement by the USDA is significant for its call for support for regenerative agriculture and its promise to fund better soil health practices, but these promises fall short in light of the massive layoffs at the NRCS earlier this year.

If the Trump administration is serious about helping America’s farmers transition to more environmentally friendly farming practices, it needs to recognize the importance of well-trained NRCS staff in helping farmers achieve those goals in real-world situations.

• DavidMurphy, founder of United We Eat, former top fundraiser for RFK, Jr’s presidential campaign

I am grateful that USDA Secretary Rollins is elevating and investing in regenerative agriculture. The Regenerative Agriculture Initiative is a significant step in the right direction. 

However, this same year, the USDA cut more than a billion dollars from local and regional food programs—such as farm-to-school and farm-to-food-bank—that provide critical markets for regenerative farmers. Clearly, there is still a long way to go.

If policymakers are serious about transitioning American agriculture toward farmer prosperity and soil regeneration, they should restore the thousands of recently eliminated NRCS staff positions that are essential to supporting farmers through this transition. USDA should also reinstate the many programs that have been cut this year, as outlined in the letter from MAHA leaders and MAHA-aligned farmers.

• Charles Eisenstein, author and former speechwriter for Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr’s presidential campaign

巨大なGMOを民間企業に無料で贈る

による FDA、 「USDAの動植物検疫サービス（APHIS）は、 植栽の農業および環境の安全性と遺伝子組み換え植物の野外試験。」

Apparently, according to the recent release of the USDA’s branch APHIS final ruling on the Movement of Certain Genetically Engineered Organisms - 7 CFR Parts 330, 340, and 372, they disagree. The statement “We do not agree,” appears 21 times in the 49 page document, with nearly all of the disagreement directed towards the comments opposing the ruling which essentially allows GMO companies to self determine if their products require regulation. There were 6,150 comments filed; only 25 expressed some support of the ruling.

APHISの判決は、GMO規制を緩和し、市場を支援し、革新し、GMO開発者のコストを削減することを意図していることを非常に明確にしています。健康や安全についての言葉ではありません。

アメリカで私たちの食品が健康で安全であると期待する消費者や国際貿易パートナーなど、誰にとっても大きな懸念事項となる13のポイントは次のとおりです。

 これは私たちの300番目の記事です！ 

うわー！この信じられないほどの旅にご参加いただきありがとうございます！

Comment to USDA Regarding GMO Regulation
By Zen Honeycutt, Moms Across America
8月 2, 2019 

このコメントの言葉は、部分的には食品安全センターに帰属し、部分的にはアメリカ中のママ（斜体）に起因しています。

新しいGMO規制は、以下の方法でアメリカおよびその他の国を脅かしています

健康：

連邦政府の医療費は2018で 3.5兆を突破しました。食物は私たちの健康の最も影響力のある要因です。アメリカの食べ物は有毒であり、私たちを病気にしている。倒産する可能性があります。

これがGMOラベリングの最後のチャンスです。

GMOに幸せで、日当たりの良い、笑顔の顔でラベルを付けたいですか？

これは、間違いなく大規模なGMO企業からの圧力によりUSDAが提案していることです。

彼らはあなたに何かを思い出させますか？おそらく有機的なシンボル？ヨーロッパに旅行したことがある場合は、ほとんどすべてのショップでこれらのロゴが下に表示されます。ヨーロッパの「BIO」はOrganicの略です。それでも、GMO業界は、「BIO-EngineeredFood」の略であるBEでGMOにラベルを付けたいと考えています。 GMO業界は有機業界を共同選択しようとしています！