Six months ago today, 6月 1, a few days after we met with the EPA, I requested per my right as a US citizen, by way of the Freedom of Information Act, to receive copies of all of the documents submitted to the EPA regarding glyphosate. Never in my life did I imagine I would be asking for potentially thousands of pages of scientific studies about a toxic chemical. I loved science when I was in sixth grade, and even imagined being one someday. However I did not think I was good at math, all the rote learning without understanding was more condescending than the looks my math teacher gave me, so I dismissed the possibility of being a scientist and headed down a more artistic path as a designer.

私は創造的な背景を持っていますが、私があなたと共有しようとしていることを補うことができませんでし。

It is incredible that any scientist or non-scientist could look at this information think glyphosate safe.

I received 9 files, ranging from 67-293 pages. Most were the actual studies, two were assessments of other studies. I do not believe I received all of the studies submitted to the EPA, and will be asking for the full set of documents. What I did receive however, in my opinion, is reason enough not to re-register glyphosate.

このブログのビデオ版をここで見て、友人と共有してください。 

The first study I open is a 96-hour study そして、それは4日でカキの死がなかったけれども、カキの大部分が「閉じられて、餌を与えていなかった」と結論づけます。 それはcom睡状態の人間に相当します！私をからかってるの？これは、グリホサートが海洋生物にとって安全であることを証明することになっていますか？
そして、4日後に何が起きましたか？カキはどのくらいの期間「閉じられ、餌を与えられなかった」のでしょうか？
私はこれを読んでおり、カキについて夫に叫んでおり、愛する人は私を我慢しています。彼は、誰かがしなければならないので、私がこのことを気にしている人であることがうれしいことさえ認めています。

 次の研究、 96-hour study on Mysid shrimp, shows that after 4 days, the "level of no-morbidity was .51 a.e.mg/L ( 1.71 mg/L MON 2139 mg/L". The level of glyphosate in our corn, husk removed is 3.5 ppm. .51 mg/L and 1.71 mg/L is equal to .51 and 1.71 ppm. And it was the level just above this that killed the shrimp after 4 days. 100% of the shrimp died at levels of 3.9 ppm.

Granted we are not as small as a shrimp, but the amount of glyphosate must be equivalent and significant in comparison. Consider that 80% of GMOs which make up 90% of our food crops and in 85% of our food are sprayed with glyphosate. In addition, many non-organic crops are also sprayed with glyphosate as a drying agent pre-harvest. Furthermore, a burn-down application of glyphosate is applied before planting, so the amount of glyphosate we potentially consume from the 160 foods with allowable glyphosate levels is from .2 - 400 ppm. This is very significant.

The average life span of a Mysid shrimp is 365 days. 4 days is 1% of it's life. How is this a study that is scientifically sound for weighing the safety of glyphosate? It's not! it's preposperous!  This test duration is equivalent to a human who lives to 78 years old being exposed to glyphosate for 284 days...less than a year.  The reality is glyphosate has been in our food supply for nearly 20 years....7300 days...already.

人間の胎児のサイズに比べて白いエビ（人間の胎児は約半分のサイズです）

Another 96-hour White shrimp study showed "the no-morbidity after 4 days was 5.2 mg/L ( 17 mg/L of MON 2139)". Higher than that and they died. The levels of glyphosate on dried sugar beet pulp, the main source of sugar in millions of American products, is 25 ppm. The average American consumes 156 pounds of sugar per year. How much glyphosate is that? What is it doing to us? A white shrimp is larger than a 6-week-old human fetus. What could glyphosate be doing to our fetuses? Why has our infertility and miscarriage rate skyrocketed to 30% just like the pigs in Denmark who ate feed sprayed with glyphosate and had their levels of miscarriage jump to 30%?

ヒトと同じDNAの魚シェア85％

The 96-hour minnow study showed the level of no-mortality at 2.1 a.e. mg to 6.8 mg MON 2139/L. Higher than that, and fish died in 4 days.We have 5 ppm of glyphosate allowed on our potatoes and 7 ppm of glyphosate allowed on tea, items that we eat/drink in large quantities. 

The 2-month (dosing period) study of canaries showed mortality at 432mg/L and with birds dying within 2 hours of dosing at 3300 ppm. Our animal feed grains are allowed by the EPA to have levels of 400 ppm and are consistently fed this amount, it is not just a one or two-time dose during 4 days of their life.

 マウスの研究は単なる 28日... 1か月もしません...そして、彼らはマウスに何の変化も要求していませんが...この期間は、食物に噴霧される有毒化学物質の消費の安全性に関する科学的研究として有効であると思われますか？長期にわたる研究が行われた場合、法律で義務付けられているため、彼らは私にそれらを送りませんでした。

So the next time a GMO scientist tells you they have "hundreds of studies" showing the safety of GMOs and Glyphosate, ask them, how long are those studies for? What were the results? If the animals did not DIE, did they exhibit other symptoms (like not eating) that would lead to their death shortly after the duration of the study?

These studies, even in their small scope and short duration show that glyphosate should not be re registered. It's not sound science to see these as showing safety by any scope of the imagination and in addition this mother, for one, would prefer to be better safe than sorry than to feed my kid a chemical that has most oysters "closed and not feeding" after 4 days. It's hard enough to feed my kids, Thank you very much. I chose organic.

今グリホサートのレビューに関してあなたが決定すべきだと思うことをEPAに伝えてください。彼らは現在これらの研究を読んで評価しており、クリスマスまでに決定を下します。接触：

ニール・アンダーソン

リスク管理および実装ブランチIチーフ

農薬再評価課

US EPA（メールコード7508 P）

1200ペンシルベニアアベニュー、北西

ワシントンDC 20460

Phone: 703-308-8187

[メール保護]

禅ハニーカット

PS研究は機密事項であり、実際の文書を共有することはできません。情報公開法により、必要なあらゆる種類の情報をリクエストできます。